تحلیل روایت زنان سالمند از شاخص‌های روانی‌-‌اجتماعی شهر دوستدار سالمند در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه جامعه شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه اصفهان‌، ایران.

2 گروه مطالعات زنان، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه اصفهان، ایران

10.22126/jap.2026.13838.1917

چکیده

زمینه: روند سالمندی جمعیت، به‌عنوان یکی از مهم‌ترین تحولات جمعیت‌شناختی قرن بیست‌ویکم، ضرورت توجه به ایجاد محیط‌های دوستدار سالمند را بیش از پیش آشکار ساخته است. رویکرد شهر دوستدار سالمند بر فراهم‌کردن شرایطی تأکید دارد که سالمندان بتوانند از کیفیت زندگی مطلوب، مشارکت اجتماعی و سلامت روان برخوردار شوند. بنابراین، پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی شاخص‌های اجتماعی و روان‌شناختی محیط دوستدار سالمند از دیدگاه زنان سالمند شهر خمینی‌شهر، استان اصفهان، انجام شد.
روش: این پژوهش کیفی در سال ۱۴۰۴ با رویکرد تحلیل روایت انجام شد. مشارکت‌کنندگان شامل زنان ۶۵ سال و بالاتر ساکن شهر خمینی‌شهر بودند که با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. نمونه‌گیری تا رسیدن به اشباع داده‌ها ادامه یافت و در مجموع ۲۱ زن سالمند در پژوهش شرکت کردند. داده‌ها از طریق مصاحبه‌های روایی عمیق و نیمه‌ساختاریافته گردآوری و با استفاده از روش تحلیل روایت تحلیل شدند. فرایند سازمان‌دهی، کدگذاری و تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار مکس‌کیودا نسخه ۲۰۲۰ انجام شد.
 یافته‌ها: تحلیل روایت‌های مشارکت‌کنندگان به شناسایی چهار مضمون اصلی شامل «احترام اجتماعی»، «مشارکت و روابط اجتماعی»، «مشارکت مدنی و اشتغال» و «سلامت روان» منجر شد. زیرمضمون‌های استخراج‌شده شامل کمبود امکانات شهری متناسب با نیازهای سالمندان، احساس ناامنی اجتماعی، کاهش احترام خانوادگی، شکاف نسلی، محدودیت دسترسی به خدمات درمانی و فناوری، کاهش حمایت و روابط اجتماعی، وابستگی اقتصادی، محدودیت در مشارکت اجتماعی، استرس و نگرانی، احساس تنهایی، عزت‌نفس پایین، ناامیدی نسبت به آینده و نیاز به خدمات روان‌شناختی بود. زنان سالمند همچنین از مشکلات اقتصادی، کمبود امکانات رفاهی و تفریحی، کاهش حمایت اجتماعی و دشواری در استفاده از فناوری‌های جدید سخن گفتند؛ عواملی که در روایت آنان با افزایش احساس انزوا، ناامیدی و کاهش سلامت روان همراه بود.
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد شهر خمینی‌شهر در تأمین برخی از شاخص‌های اجتماعی و روان‌شناختی شهر دوستدار سالمند با کاستی‌های قابل‌توجهی مواجه است. توسعه زیرساخت‌های رفاهی و تفریحی متناسب با نیاز سالمندان، تقویت فرصت‌های مشارکت اجتماعی و مدنی، بهبود دسترسی به خدمات سلامت روان و آموزش مهارت‌های مرتبط با فناوری می‌تواند در ارتقای کیفیت زندگی و بهزیستی روان‌شناختی زنان سالمند مؤثر باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Narrative Analysis of Older Women’s Perspectives on the Psychosocial Indicators of an Age-Friendly City in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Ghanbari Borzian 1
  • Zahra Lotfi Foroushani 2
1 Dept. of Sociology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Esfahan, Iran.
2 Dept. of Women’s Studies, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Esfahan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Background: Population aging, as one of the most significant demographic transformations of the twenty-first century, has increasingly highlighted the need to create age-friendly environments. The age-friendly city approach emphasizes providing conditions that enable older adults to maintain a desirable quality of life, participate socially, and experience psychological well-being. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify the social and psychological indicators of an age-friendly environment from the perspectives of older women living in Khomeinishahr, Isfahan Province, Iran.
Method: This qualitative study was conducted in 2025 using a narrative analysis approach. Participants were women aged 65 years and older residing in Khomeinishahr who were selected through purposive sampling. Sampling continued until data saturation was reached, resulting in the participation of 21 older women. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured narrative interviews and analyzed using narrative analysis. MAXQDA software, version 2020, was used to organize, code, and facilitate the analysis of the data.
Results: Analysis of the participants’ narratives revealed four main themes: social respect, social participation and relationships, civic participation and employment, and mental health. The identified subthemes included inadequate urban facilities tailored to the needs of older adults, feelings of social insecurity, reduced family respect, generational gaps, limited access to healthcare services and technology, decreased social support and relationships, economic dependency, restricted social participation, stress and worry, feelings of loneliness, low self-esteem, hopelessness about the future, and the need for psychological services. Older women also described economic difficulties, inadequate recreational and welfare facilities, reduced social support, and difficulties in using new technologies, which, in their narratives, were associated with greater feelings of isolation and hopelessness and poorer mental health.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that Khomeinishahr faces considerable shortcomings in meeting several social and psychological indicators of an age-friendly city. Developing welfare and recreational infrastructures tailored to the needs of older adults, strengthening opportunities for social and civic participation, improving access to mental health services, and providing technology-related skills training may contribute to improving the quality of life and psychological well-being of older women.
EXTENDED ABSTRACT
Introduction
Population aging is one of the most significant demographic transformations of the twenty-first century and has heightened the need to address older adults’ quality of life and the creation of supportive living environments. Quality of life in later life is not determined solely by physical health or access to healthcare services; it is also profoundly shaped by the social and psychological characteristics of the environment in which older adults live. In this context, the concept of an age-friendly city emphasizes the creation of environments that enable older adults to maintain independence, feel safe, participate in social life, and experience psychological well-being. The psychosocial dimensions of an age-friendly city include social respect, social participation and relationships, civic participation and employment, and mental health. These dimensions are closely associated with older adults’ sense of self-worth, social belonging, and life satisfaction. Deficiencies in these areas may contribute to reduced social support, increased loneliness, economic dependency, restricted participation, and poorer mental health. Despite the importance of these dimensions, most studies conducted in Iran have focused primarily on quantitative assessments of age-friendly urban indicators, while relatively little attention has been paid to older adults’ lived experiences. This gap is particularly important for older women, who may face greater social and economic constraints in later life. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore and analyze older women’s narratives of the psychosocial indicators of an age-friendly city in Khomeinishahr, Isfahan Province, Iran.
Method
This qualitative study was conducted in 2025 in Khomeinishahr, Isfahan Province, using a narrative analysis approach. The study population consisted of women aged 65 years and older who were residents of Khomeinishahr. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling, which continued until data saturation was achieved. A total of 21 older women participated in the study. The inclusion criteria were being 65 years of age or older, residing in Khomeinishahr, being able to communicate verbally, willingness to participate in the study, and providing informed consent. The exclusion criteria included withdrawal from the study, inability to continue the interview, or incomplete information. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured narrative interviews focusing on participants’ experiences of the psychosocial dimensions of an age-friendly city, including social respect, social participation and relationships, civic participation and employment, and mental health. Interviews lasted between 45 and 80 minutes and were conducted in settings preferred by the participants, including their homes, parks, and mosques. Following verbatim transcription, the interviews were analyzed thematically within a narrative analysis framework. Initial codes were identified from the narratives, and conceptually similar codes were subsequently organized into subthemes and overarching themes. MAXQDA software, version 2020, was used to facilitate data organization and coding. To enhance the credibility and trustworthiness of the findings, several strategies were employed, including member checking, peer review, repeated examination of the data, and reflexive consideration of the researchers’ preconceptions.
Results
The analysis showed that older women’s experiences of the urban environment could be organized into four major themes: social respect, social participation and relationships, civic participation and employment, and mental health. Within the theme of social respect, participants described inadequate urban facilities for older adults, the absence of neighborhood parks in older parts of the city, the considerable distance to cultural and recreational centers, feelings of social insecurity, and a perceived decline in respect for older adults within the family. Participants also reported that social and technological changes had increased their dependence on others. Difficulties in using electronic services, paying bills, booking medical appointments, and accessing online services contributed to feelings of inadequacy and diminished independence. The generational gap and the perceived lack of interest among younger people in older adults’ knowledge and experiences were also frequently described as important challenges. With regard to social participation and relationships, participants reported declining social support, less frequent family visits, and the narrowing of their social networks, often to interactions with their children alone. Many women described experiences of loneliness, exclusion from certain family interactions, and a diminished social role. They felt that, compared with the past, older adults were less frequently consulted or included in family and community decision-making. The theme of civic participation and employment reflected a range of economic, physical, and cultural barriers to continued participation in social life. Participants described a lack of appropriate opportunities to remain economically or socially active, the declining social value attributed to traditional skills such as knitting and handicrafts, and the absence of pension income among many women who had spent much of their lives as homemakers. Financial dependence on children was a particularly important concern. Some participants also expressed the feeling that society no longer valued or needed their accumulated knowledge, skills, and life experience. Within the theme of mental health, older women described stress and persistent worries about their children’s future, financial hardship, illness, bereavement following the death of a spouse or child, loneliness, and diminished self-esteem. Many participants viewed themselves as a burden on their families and expressed little hope for the future. Limited access to psychological services, either because of their high cost, insufficient awareness of available services, or a lack of appropriate local support centers, was another important concern.
Conclusion
The findings indicate that Khomeinishahr faces substantial challenges in meeting the psychosocial requirements of an age-friendly city. The narratives of older women demonstrate that aging is not merely a biological process but also a deeply social experience shaped by the quality of interpersonal relationships, opportunities for participation, availability of social support, and individuals’ sense of being valued by others. Inadequate age-appropriate urban spaces, declining social interaction, limited opportunities for civic participation, and financial difficulties contributed to feelings of isolation, dependency, and social marginalization among many participants. These findings are consistent with previous studies conducted in Iran and other countries on age-friendly city indicators, which have emphasized the importance of the social environment, social participation, and community support in promoting older adults’ quality of life. The findings further suggest that aging policies in Iran should not focus exclusively on healthcare services and physical needs. Greater attention should also be paid to the psychological and social dimensions of later life. Developing accessible social and recreational spaces close to older adults’ neighborhoods, strengthening opportunities for social participation, providing training in digital and technological skills, expanding accessible mental health services, and improving economic support for older women may contribute to the development of more age-friendly communities. Importantly, older adults’ own narratives should be regarded as a valuable source of evidence in urban planning and policy-making. Incorporating their experiences, needs, and perspectives into decision-making processes may help create more inclusive environments that support independence, participation, dignity, and psychological well-being in later life.
Ethical Consid ration
Ethical Code
Before the interviews, the purpose of the study was explained to the participants, and their consent to participate was obtained. Participant confidentiality was maintained by using identification codes rather than personal information.
Funding
This study received no external funding.
Authors’ Contributions

L. F.: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, data collection, data analysis, data curation, writing-original draft, and writing-review and editing. A. G. B.: Conceptualization, methodology, supervision, project administration, and writing-review and editing.

Conflict of Interest
The author had no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge all older women who participated in this study and generously shared their experiences and personal narratives.
Afsharkohan, J., & Koolivand, S. (2015). Structured Study of the Quality of Life in the Elderly in Iran (2004-2013). Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing, 10(3), 192–201. [Persian]
Andrews, G. R. (2001). Promoting health and function in an ageing population. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 322(7288), 728–729. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7288.72
Chao, T. S., & Huang, H. (2016). The East Asian age-friendly cities promotion—Taiwan’s experience and the need for an oriental paradigm. Global Health Promotion, 23(1 Suppl), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975916641
Costa, D. L. (2000). The Evolution of Retirement: An American Economic History, 1880-1990. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo3623189.html
Calvo, E., & Williamson, J.b,. (2008). Old-age pension reform and modernization pathways: Lessons for China from Latin America. Journal of Aging Studies, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2007.02.004
Estebsari, F., RahimiKhalifeh Kandi, Z., Estebsari, K., & Mostafaei, D. (2020). Elderly Friendly City Concepts and Indicators. Iranian Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion, 8(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijhehp.8.1.5
Flick, U., Fischer, C., Schwartz, F. W., & Walter, U. (2002). Social Representations of Health Held by Health Professionals: The Case of General Practitioners and Home-care Nurses. Social Science Information, 41(4), 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018402041
Flores, R., Caballer, A., & Alarcón, A. (2019). Evaluation of an Age-Friendly City and Its Effect on Life Satisfaction: A Two-Stage Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 5073.
Iranshahi, A., & Ghalehnoee, M. (2020). (2017). An evaluation of urban spaces conformity with the indicators of age-friendly city: The case of Chahar Bagh-e Abbasi Street of Isfahan. Hoviatshahr, 11(2), 67–78. [Persian]
Ivan, L., Dikken, J., & van Hoof, J. (2024). Unveiling the experienced age-friendliness of older people in Bucharest: A comprehensive study using the validated Romanian age-friendly cities and communities’ questionnaire and cluster analysis. Habitat International, 143, 102973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102973
Karami, B., Mahaki, B., Mohammad Karimi Mazhin, A., Alimorad Nori, M., & Tajvar, M. (2023). An Age-Friendly City Indicators of Kermanshah Based on World Health Organization Model. Payesh (Health Monitor), 22(4), 387–401. [Persian]
Nekooei, S., & Saberi, H. (2021). Explanation of the planning of elderly-friendly urban spaces, a case study: Hezar Jarib neighborhood. ResearchGate, 6(2), 39-54. [Persian]
Nouri, A., & Farsi, S. (2018). Expectations of Institutionalized Elderly From Their Children. Iranian Journal of Ageing, 13(2), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.32598/sija.13.2.262 [Persian]
Ollonqvist, K., Palkeinen, H., Aaltonen, T., Pohjolainen, T., Puukka, P., Hinkka, K., & Pöntinen, S. (2008). Alleviating loneliness among frail older people—Findings from a randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 10(2), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623730.2008.9721760
Paiva, N. M. D., Ahmed, N. B., Daniel, F., & Silva, A. G. D. (2018). Age-friendly Coimbra city, Portugal, perception and quality of life in a sample of elderly persons. 24, 1473-1482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018244.08902017
Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities. Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities - Tine Buffel, Chris Phillipson, Thomas scharf, 2012. Critical Social Policy. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0261018311430457
Karami, B., Mahaki, B., Mohammad Karimi Mazhin, A., Alimorad Nori, M., & Tajvar, M. (2023). Age‑friendly city indicators of Kermanshah based on World Health Organization model. Payesh, 22(4), 387–401. http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-2014-fa.html [Persian]
Pan, Z., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Huo, Z., & Han, W. (2024). Age‑friendly neighbourhood environment, functional abilities and life satisfaction: A longitudinal analysis of older adults in urban China. Social Science & Medicine, 340, 116403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116403
Plouffe, L., & Kalache, A. (2010). Towards global age‑friendly cities: Determining urban features that promote active aging. Journal of Urban Health, 87, 733–739.
Rafi, S., & Saif, S. (2020). Age‑friendly communities: Creating a conducive environment for the elderly in India. Journal of Geriatric Medicine, 2(2), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.30564/jgm.v2i2.2313
Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1985). Social support: Insights from assessment and experimentation. In Social support: Theory, research and applications In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (39–50). Springer
Sharqi, A., Zarghami, E., Salehi Kousalari, F., & Olfat, M. (2014). Evaluating status of global indices of age‑friendly city in Tehran metropolis. Urban and Regional Studies, ) 1–22. [Persian]
Shokri Yazdi, O., Hayati, A., & Safar, Z. (2015). A comparative study of quality of life between elderly residents in nursing homes and those living with families: A case study of the elderly in Urmia city. Journal of Sociological Studies, 8(28), 77–94. [Persian]
Sun, Y., Phillips, D. R., & Wong, M. (2018). A study of housing typology and perceived age‑friendliness in an established Hong Kong new town: A person‑environment perspective. Geoforum, 88, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.001
Tajvar, M., Torabi, M., Dargahi, H., Atashbahar, O., & Sajadi, H. S. (2023). Assessing the Isfahan hospitals based on the World Health Organization’s age‑friendly hospital model: A mixed method study. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing, 18(2), 234–251. [Persian]
Van Hoof, J., & Kazak, J. K. (2018). Urban ageing. Indoor and Built Environment, 27(5), 583–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X18768
Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1989). Situating kinship relations in broader networks of social support. Sociological Perspectives, 32, 273–306. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389119
World Health Organization. (2007). Global age‑friendly cities: A guide. Geneva: World Health Organization.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • aging
  • age-friendly city
  • older women
  • psychosocial indicators
  • narrative analysis
افشارکهن، ج.، و کولی‌وند، ش. (۱۳۹۴). مطالعه ساختاریافته کیفیت زندگی سالمندان در ایران. سالمند: مجله سالمندی ایران، ۱۰(۳)، 201–192.
شرقی، ع.، ضرغامی، ا.، صالحی کوسالاری، ف.، و الفت، م. (۱۳۹۵). سنجش وضعیت شاخص‌های جهانی شهر دوستدار سالمند در کلان‌شهر تهران. مطالعات و پژوهش‌های شهری و منطقه‌ای، 22–1.
عطایی، ه.، و قندهاری، ر. (۱۳۹۸). ارزیابی شاخص‌های فضای شهری دوستدار سالمند میدان نقش جهان اصفهان. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های علوم جغرافیایی، معماری و شهرسازی، ۲(۱۶).
غفاری گیلانده، چ.، و الهام، د. (۱۴۰۱). ارزیابی شاخص‌های شهر دوستدار سالمند: مطالعه موردی شهر ساری. آمایش محیط، ۱۵(۵۶)، 25–1.
کرمی، ب.، رضایی، س.، نیا، س. ع.، شااحمدی، ف.، و کریانی، ع. ک. (۱۳۹۲). سالمندی در ایران ۱۴۱۰: هشداری برای نظام سلامت. فصلنامه طب و تزکیه، ۲۲(۲)، 18–9.
کرمی، ب.، محکی، ب.، کریمی، ع.، علیمراد نوری، م.، و تاجور، م. (بی‌تا). شاخص‌های شهر دوستدار سالمند کرمانشاه بر اساس مدل سازمان بهداشت جهانی. پایش، ۲۲(۴)، 401–387.
نکویی، س.، و صابری، ح. (۱۴۰۰). تبیین برنامه‌ریزی فضاهای شهری دوستدار سالمند: مطالعه موردی محله هزار جریب. مدیریت مهندسی و ساخت، ۶(۲)، 54–39.
نوری، ع.، و فارسی، س. (۱۳۹۷). انتظارات سالمندان مقیم آسایشگاه از فرزندانشان. سالمند: مجله سالمندی ایران، ۱۳(۲)، 279–262.
References
Afsharkohan, J., & Koolivand, S. (2015). Structured Study of the Quality of Life in the Elderly in Iran (2004-2013). Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing, 10(3), 192–201. [Persian]
Andrews, G. R. (2001). Promoting health and function in an ageing population. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 322(7288), 728–729. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7288.72
Chao, T. S., & Huang, H. (2016). The East Asian age-friendly cities promotion—Taiwan’s experience and the need for an oriental paradigm. Global Health Promotion, 23(1 Suppl), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975916641
Costa, D. L. (2000). The Evolution of Retirement: An American Economic History, 1880-1990. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo3623189.html
Calvo, E., & Williamson, J.b,. (2008). Old-age pension reform and modernization pathways: Lessons for China from Latin America. Journal of Aging Studies, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2007.02.004
Estebsari, F., RahimiKhalifeh Kandi, Z., Estebsari, K., & Mostafaei, D. (2020). Elderly Friendly City Concepts and Indicators. Iranian Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion, 8(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijhehp.8.1.5
Flick, U., Fischer, C., Schwartz, F. W., & Walter, U. (2002). Social Representations of Health Held by Health Professionals: The Case of General Practitioners and Home-care Nurses. Social Science Information, 41(4), 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018402041
Flores, R., Caballer, A., & Alarcón, A. (2019). Evaluation of an Age-Friendly City and Its Effect on Life Satisfaction: A Two-Stage Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 5073.
Iranshahi, A., & Ghalehnoee, M. (2020). (2017). An evaluation of urban spaces conformity with the indicators of age-friendly city: The case of Chahar Bagh-e Abbasi Street of Isfahan. Hoviatshahr, 11(2), 67–78. [Persian]
Ivan, L., Dikken, J., & van Hoof, J. (2024). Unveiling the experienced age-friendliness of older people in Bucharest: A comprehensive study using the validated Romanian age-friendly cities and communities’ questionnaire and cluster analysis. Habitat International, 143, 102973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102973
Karami, B., Mahaki, B., Mohammad Karimi Mazhin, A., Alimorad Nori, M., & Tajvar, M. (2023). An Age-Friendly City Indicators of Kermanshah Based on World Health Organization Model. Payesh (Health Monitor), 22(4), 387–401. [Persian]
Nekooei, S., & Saberi, H. (2021). Explanation of the planning of elderly-friendly urban spaces, a case study: Hezar Jarib neighborhood. ResearchGate, 6(2), 39-54. [Persian]
Nouri, A., & Farsi, S. (2018). Expectations of Institutionalized Elderly From Their Children. Iranian Journal of Ageing, 13(2), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.32598/sija.13.2.262 [Persian]
Ollonqvist, K., Palkeinen, H., Aaltonen, T., Pohjolainen, T., Puukka, P., Hinkka, K., & Pöntinen, S. (2008). Alleviating loneliness among frail older people—Findings from a randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 10(2), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623730.2008.9721760
Paiva, N. M. D., Ahmed, N. B., Daniel, F., & Silva, A. G. D. (2018). Age-friendly Coimbra city, Portugal, perception and quality of life in a sample of elderly persons. 24, 1473-1482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018244.08902017
Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities. Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities - Tine Buffel, Chris Phillipson, Thomas scharf, 2012. Critical Social Policy. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0261018311430457
Karami, B., Mahaki, B., Mohammad Karimi Mazhin, A., Alimorad Nori, M., & Tajvar, M. (2023). Age‑friendly city indicators of Kermanshah based on World Health Organization model. Payesh, 22(4), 387–401. http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-2014-fa.html [Persian]
Pan, Z., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Huo, Z., & Han, W. (2024). Age‑friendly neighbourhood environment, functional abilities and life satisfaction: A longitudinal analysis of older adults in urban China. Social Science & Medicine, 340, 116403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116403
Plouffe, L., & Kalache, A. (2010). Towards global age‑friendly cities: Determining urban features that promote active aging. Journal of Urban Health, 87, 733–739.
Rafi, S., & Saif, S. (2020). Age‑friendly communities: Creating a conducive environment for the elderly in India. Journal of Geriatric Medicine, 2(2), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.30564/jgm.v2i2.2313
Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1985). Social support: Insights from assessment and experimentation. In Social support: Theory, research and applications In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (39–50). Springer
Sharqi, A., Zarghami, E., Salehi Kousalari, F., & Olfat, M. (2014). Evaluating status of global indices of age‑friendly city in Tehran metropolis. Urban and Regional Studies, ) 1–22. [Persian]
Shokri Yazdi, O., Hayati, A., & Safar, Z. (2015). A comparative study of quality of life between elderly residents in nursing homes and those living with families: A case study of the elderly in Urmia city. Journal of Sociological Studies, 8(28), 77–94. [Persian]
Sun, Y., Phillips, D. R., & Wong, M. (2018). A study of housing typology and perceived age‑friendliness in an established Hong Kong new town: A person‑environment perspective. Geoforum, 88, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.001
Tajvar, M., Torabi, M., Dargahi, H., Atashbahar, O., & Sajadi, H. S. (2023). Assessing the Isfahan hospitals based on the World Health Organization’s age‑friendly hospital model: A mixed method study. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing, 18(2), 234–251. [Persian]
Van Hoof, J., & Kazak, J. K. (2018). Urban ageing. Indoor and Built Environment, 27(5), 583–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X18768
Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1989). Situating kinship relations in broader networks of social support. Sociological Perspectives, 32, 273–306. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389119
World Health Organization. (2007). Global age‑friendly cities: A guide. Geneva: World Health Organization